Sign in or 

|
openartist |
Focus
Jul 4 2006, 1:37 PM EDT
I agree that we should perhaps focus on one climate solution first and then branch out from there. It would also be great to then offer "accessories" or options that would improve the housing unit.As far as size etc. I'd like to see the base unit able to support a couple at the very least. I'm going to look into creating a dedicated site for the project. Does anyone have any suggestions as to what we'll need from the site? Here are some new questions and ideas I thought about the structure: • Is the structure easily expandable? * Can the pieces be prefabricated and easily shipped? Imagine an Ikea-like house that comes in a large box that you put together with a single tool! * Can walls/dividers be designed that the home owner can easily move and reconfigure? Perhaps they hang from the ceiling? * Should a typical "box" be the design or maybe something more exotic like a geodesic dome? -Paul Do you find this valuable? |
|
samaritan |
1. RE: Focus
Jul 4 2006, 10:17 PM EDT
While I agree that focusing on one geographic region will make it easier, there are specific building methods that can be used in one area that cannot be used in another. We have looked at earth ships, and other alternative construction, but though they work well in the dry South West, in Michigan they just don't. I would love to perticipate in this project, but if it starts heading towards region specific builing methods (climate requirements for building, and maintenance), I am afraid I will not be much help.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
weber |
2. RE: Focus
Jul 5 2006, 7:01 AM EDT
"I'm going to look into creating a dedicated site for the project. Does anyone have any suggestions as to what we'll need from the site?Isn't this the dedicated site for this project? Do you find this valuable? |